| Query | Bing | Brave | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q1. "Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra" Branded with intent |
Possible 2/5 factors. samsung.com/us product page at #5 + #10. Android Police, Trak.in, Digitimes, Sammy Fans editorial coverage fills the rest. Carriers + Amazon also surface. AI summary uses Samsung's own marketing copy. |
Possible 3/5 factors. samsung.com/uk/smartphones/galaxy-s26-ultra/ at #1 with the snippet "Meet the new Galaxy S26 Ultra, the latest AI phone." GSMArena #2. UK carriers (Three, Currys, Tesco Mobile, O2) fill #3 to #6. Strongest cell in the grid alongside Brave Q1. |
Possible 3/5 factors. samsung.com/uk/smartphones/galaxy-s26-ultra/ at #1, /buy/ at #2. UK carriers + retailers (O2, Currys, Uswitch, Carphone Warehouse, Tesco Mobile) at #3 to #8. The Guardian #10. Strongest UK-domain surface across all three engines. |
| Q2. "Samsung Galaxy reviews" Branded reputation |
Possible 2/5 factors. samsung.com/us /reviews pages at #3 + #7. Tech Advisor, Best Buy, Consumer Affairs, GSMArena, TechRadar fill the rest. Mixed brand-owned and third-party. No dominant negative-sentiment review host. |
Possible 2/5 factors. samsung.com homepage #1, samsung-climatesolutions.com #2 (Samsung Climate sub-brand), Argos #3, Wikipedia #4, Selfridges #5, MoneySuperMarket #6, TechRadar #7. Brand-domain dominance. |
Possible 2/5 factors. Which? #1, samsung.com/uk/smartphones/galaxy-s25/reviews/ #2, /galaxy-s25-ultra/reviews/ #3, PCMag #4, Reviews.io #5. Samsung's own /reviews pages place 2-3. Brand owns the positive-sentiment review surface. |
| Q3. "best Android phone 2026" Commercial non-brand · category |
Unlikely 1/5 factors. Tech Advisor #1 (Pixel 10 Pro XL "finest smartphone you can buy"), PhoneArena #2, Stuff #3, Android Authority #5, Forbes #6, GSMArena #7. Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra mentioned in snippets but no samsung.com URL. Pixel + OnePlus + Oppo named first. |
Unlikely 1/5 factors. PCMag #1, WIRED #2 (Moto G Power 2026), Expert Reviews #3 (Pixel 10 named best), Android Authority #4, Forbes #5. Samsung named in snippets, no own URL. Same Pixel-led editorial pattern as Google. |
Unlikely 1/5 factors. Reddit r/Smartphones at #1 (Brave forum-bias visible), WIRED #2, Tech Advisor #3, PCMag #4, PhoneBot #5 ("Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads with 200MP quad-camera"), TechRadar #8 ("best Android phone ever"). Samsung named in 5 snippets, no own URL. |
| Q4. "best smartphone UK 2026" Commercial non-brand · superlative |
Unlikely 1/5 factors. Tech Advisor #1, Expert Reviews #2 (Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra named "best smartphone you can buy" in AI summary), Stuff, TechRadar UK, HTT Mobiles, Young Mobile UK fill the rest. Samsung positively mentioned but no own URL. |
Unlikely 0/5 factors. Severe Bing tokenisation failure. "Best" tokenises to dictionary definitions: Cambridge, Merriam-Webster, Free Dictionary, WordReference, Oxford, Vocabulary.com, US Dictionary, YourDictionary, Collins. Nine of ten results. Hearst "BEST Magazine" brand at #9. Zero commercial relevance. |
Unlikely 1/5 factors. Tech Advisor #1 (Pixel 10 Pro XL named), Stuff #2 (iPhone 17), Expert Reviews UK #3 (mentions Z Fold7 + S26 Ultra), TechRadar #4 (S25 Ultra + Z Fold 7 listed), iD Mobile #8 (S25 noted), HTT Mobiles #9 (S26 Ultra listed). Samsung models named in 4 to 5 positions, no samsung.com own URL. |
| Q5. "phone with best camera 2026" Use-case |
Unlikely 1/5 factors. PhotoBohemian #1, Digital Camera World #2 (S26 Ultra named "best for still photography"), GSMArena #3, PhoneArena #4 (Samsung named camera winner), Mobile Klinik #6, 91mobiles #8 (Samsung crown for camera). Samsung positively named as "best flagship camera phone"; no samsung.com URL. |
Unlikely 0/5 factors. UK retailers dominate: Currys #1, Apple App Store #2, Argos #3, Tesco Mobile #4, Amazon UK #5, Carphone Warehouse #6, MoneySuperMarket #7. Aggregator-only surface. Samsung not surfaced by name in snippets for this query. |
Unlikely 1/5 factors. PhotoBohemian #1, Digital Camera World #2, PCMag #3, Reddit r/Smartphones at #4 + #5 + #6 (three forum threads, Brave forum-bias), Independent #7, Amateur Photographer #9 (S26 Ultra mentioned), Tech Advisor #10. Samsung in 2 snippets, no own URL. |
| Q6. "should I buy Samsung Galaxy or iPhone" Question-format |
Possible 2/5 factors. Samsung Community eu.community.samsung.com #3, Samsung Members r1.community.samsung.com #8 -- Samsung's own community surfaces. Trusted Reviews #1, Rokform #2, Tech in Deep #4, GoNextGen UK #5, Quora #6, Android Authority #7 fill the rest. |
Unlikely 0/5 factors. Severe Bing tokenisation failure. "Should" tokenises to modal-verb grammar references: Cambridge, British Council, Collins, Free Dictionary, English Club, Wiktionary, Dictionary.com. Ten of ten results. Most severe Bing failure of this audit. |
Unlikely 1/5 factors. Reddit r/Smartphones #1, GoNextGen UK #2 (Samsung positively named: "better battery life, storage and a better camera"), Mobiles.co.uk #3, Android Authority #4, Reddit r/samsung #5, Trusted Reviews #6, Back Market #7, Which? #8, Tech in Deep #9 (Samsung positive framing), Quora #10. Samsung positively named in 3 snippets but no samsung.com own URL. eu.community.samsung.com which surfaced on Google does NOT surface here. |
| Host | AI citation frequency | Samsung's presence |
|---|---|---|
| TechRadar / Tech Advisor (UK editorial reviewers) | High | Active Top-tier UK consumer-tech editorial. Both review Samsung flagships within weeks of release and surface across all three engines for branded and category queries. Cannot be made more Active (third-party editorial). |
| Which? | High (UK consumer authority) | Mentioned UK consumer-protection authority. Surfaces #1 on Brave Q2 with Samsung mobile phone reviews coverage. Independent-test-based; Samsung mentioned and ranked. Editorial outreach (provide hands-on units, share UK lab data) is the available lever. |
| PCMag UK / Expert Reviews UK / Trusted Reviews | High | Active Samsung flagships reviewed and rated across these UK editorial hosts. Appears in best-of lists, dedicated reviews, comparison guides. Editorial outreach continues to be the lever for sustained presence. |
| Reddit (r/Smartphones, r/Samsung, r/AskUK) | Medium-High (Brave-visible) | Mentioned Surfaces at #1 of Brave for Q3 and Q6. Three Reddit threads in Brave top 10 for Q5. Forum-bias pattern means Reddit presence directly affects Cited-rung citation reach. r/samsung is the brand's own subreddit; verified-merchant or active-engagement program would shift signal. |
| UK carriers + retailers (Currys, Three, O2, Tesco Mobile, Carphone Warehouse, Argos) | Medium | Active All carry Samsung product. Surface heavily in Bing and Brave top 10 for branded queries. Currys publishes the £1,374 price for the S26 Ultra that Samsung's own canonical page hides. Third-party retailers publish what Samsung does not. |
These are the external sources AI engines pull from when answering category queries in Consumer electronics. Presence on high-frequency hosts is the fastest lever to move up the Maturity Curve. If you work with a PR agency, share this table with them. It is their placement brief.
1 of 3 readiness checks pass. Pricing extractability: FAIL. The /smartphones/galaxy-s26-ultra/ landing page surfaces Reserve / Pre-order / Buy / Where-to-buy CTAs but no pound figures in HTML text; Currys.co.uk shows £1,374.00 for the same product. Feature data structure: FAIL. Product spec comparisons exist via tabbed and carousel UI (S26 Ultra vs S26+ vs S26, plus S22 to S25 lineage) but NOT in semantic table or definition-list elements that AI can parse statically. Comparison claims: PASS. Factual claims present throughout (200MP camera, Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, 39% NPU boost, 6.9-inch display) without unsupported marketing adjective dominance.
None of the 7 canonical AI bots (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, anthropic-ai, OAI-SearchBot, PerplexityBot, GoogleOther, CCBot) are globally disallowed. GPTBot, OAI-SearchBot, ChatGPT-User, and PerplexityBot share a User-agent block with Googlebot and the wildcard; the first directive is empty Disallow (no global block); subsequent Disallows are path-level operational only (search results, parking pages, Samsung's own /ai-search/ feature pages, system pages, contact-CEO form). None cover content surfaces. Bingbot and Bravebot fall under the wildcard rules and are also fully open. This is the optimal AI-crawler configuration.
Bingbot and Bravebot both allowed under the shared User-agent block (no per-bot restrictions). IndexNow not detected at canonical key-file paths and no x-indexnow header on the homepage. Sitemap is declared (80+ region-specific XML files, including www.samsung.com/sitemap.xml). The two standard recommendations below close to Multi-engine ready.
1. Verify in Bing Webmaster Tools at bing.com/webmasters. Submit sitemap. Bing's index powers ChatGPT search and ChatGPT browse mode. Roughly 30 minutes.
2. Implement IndexNow. Generate key, host at /<key>.txt, ping endpoint on every publish. One call notifies Bing + Yandex + Seznam + Naver instantly. Roughly 1 hour.
Brave note: No webmaster tools exist. Bravebot status above is the only controllable surface. Brave's index is otherwise fed by the Web Discovery Project (passive opt-in via Brave-browser users) plus a Bing-licensed fallback for sparse queries.
This report covers AI Search only. The full Web Intelligence Report adds Design, Brand, Competitive position, and Growth — with a £-denominated business impact model and three competitor deep-dives.
Your £250 credit toward the full report: